Sven Giegold
Mitglied der Grünen/EFA-Fraktion im Europaparlament

Sprecher Europagruppe Grüne

Whistleblower: Rechtsausschuss des EU-Parlaments fordert bisher stärksten Rechtsschutz für Hinweisgeber

Gestern Abend hat der Rechtsausschuss (JURI) des Europäischen Parlaments einen Bericht beschlossen, in dem die wichtigsten Elemente für einen wirksamen Schutz von Whistleblowern festgelegt werden. Den Beschluss kommentiert der Europaabgeordnete Sven Giegold, finanz- und wirtschaftspolitischer Sprecher der Grünen im Europaparlament und Berichterstatter für Transparenz, Rechenschaftspflicht und Integrität in den EU-Institutionen:

“Die entschiedene Haltung zum Schutz von Hinweisgebern ist ein großer Erfolg für die Demokratie in Europa. Es ist der bisher umfassendste und stärkste Beschluss zum Schutz von Whistleblowern in Europa. Nun ist die EU-Kommission am Zuge und muss bis Ende des Jahres einen Entwurf für das Gesetz vorlegen. Whistleblower haben bereits in vielen Fällen dazu beigetragen, das europäische öffentliche Interesse zu schützen. Wer das öffentliche Interesse verteidigt, verdient Unterstützung statt Bestrafung. Besonders wichtig für Hinweisgeber ist die Forderung des EU-Parlaments nach Rechtsbeistand und finanzielle Entschädigung. Wer Licht ins Dunkel fragwürdiger Machenschaften bringt, wie bei den Panama-Papieren und Luxemburger Leaks, wird oft mit Klagen überzogen. Daher ist es ein wichtiger Fortschritt, die Beweislast vom Hinweisgeber zu den Schuldigen zu verschieben.

Wir werden die gestern Abend erzielten Fortschritte im Hinblick auf die bevorstehende Abstimmung im Plenum am 23. Oktober unterstützen und die EU-Kommission auffordern, den Termin für die Vorlage eines Legislativvorschlags bis Ende dieses Jahres einzuhalten.”

——–

BACKGROUND: Briefing on key details of the report adopted in JURI

European Parliament demands protection for whistleblowers across Europe

 

The European Parliament’s Legal Affairs Committee is calling on the Commission to propose legislation to protect whistleblowers across Europe, regardless of  no matter how the information was gathered  they came across the information  or by  what medium was used or which channel  of reporting they use to sound the alarm.

The report takes on board Greens/EFA demands that the  protection should be afforded to all those who reveal information that is in the public interest including information which reveals wrongdoing or other irregularities.

Another key demand, reflected in the report adopted today, is the need to ensure that protection extends to both the private and public sectors. To this end, the Commission is called upon to present, before the end of the year, to draft legislation to protect whistleblowers which is as wide and comprehensive (or “horizontal”) as possible, and in the report of  the Legal Affairs Committee has highlighted the possibility of using several legal bases in tandem in order to achieve a strong result.

The report, which was adopted on 2th of  October 2017 in the JURI committee,  and will be put to a plenary vote on 23rd October r, It calls for protection offor whistleblowers – as well as people who assist them – against reprisal, including exempting them from civil and criminal proceedings, from unjustified legal prosecutions, from economic sanctions and from discrimination.

The JURI committee has proposed to reverse the burden of proof, so that it is up to the employer to demonstrate that any actions taken against an employee are unrelated to their role as a whistleblower, and it calls for sanctions to be introduced in case of attacks on whistleblowers or attempts to prevent them from speaking up.

Importantly, the report emphasised the need to ensure that the substance of a whistleblower alert is duly investigated and that the whistleblower is kept informed throughout the process. It recommends that the whistleblowers should be able to clarify their complaint and provide additional information or evidence if needed, which was a key demand put forward to the Greens/EFA group during our public consultation https://www.greens-efa.eu/en/article/news/positive-feedback-on-greens-efa-draft-eu-directive-for-the-protection-of-whisteblowers/ on our draft Directive for whistleblower protection https://www.greens-efa.eu/en/article/whistle-blowers-directive/ published in May 2016.

One of our key battles during this report was to ensure that the focus of whistleblower protection is on the actual information revealed, rather than obsessing about the intentions of the whistleblower, because this leads to unnecessary stigmatisation and character judgement. Whistleblowers are of course required to believe that the information they reported is true at the time of reporting it.

The report calls for psychological support, legal aid,  and social and financial aid where necessary, as well as compensation in case whistleblowers suffer as a result of their disclosures. It emphasises that anonymous reporting should be permitted, though it states that it should be clear “exactly in which cases means of reporting anonymously apply”. Finally, it calls for criminal penalties and sanctions to be put in place if the identity of a whistleblower is revealed without their consent.

It is worth highlighting that the report calls on the Commission to protect individuals who are outside the traditional employee-employer relationship, such as consultant, contractors, trainees, volunteers, students workers, temporary workers, former employees.

Last but not least, the report recommends to the establishment of independent bodies in the EU Member States, with sufficient budgetary resources and sufficient powers, tothat would collect whistleblower reports, verify them, ensure a follow-up is given, guide whistleblowers and publish annual reports on whistleblower protection.

At EU level, a similar body is recommended, though a suggestion is made that the European Ombudsman might be able to take on the role, which includes coordinating Member State activities, particularly in cross-border cases, and also collecting whistleblower reports, issuing binding recommendations and guiding whistleblowers when the response given by the Member State or national bodies is obviously not appropriate.

 

What next?

For its part, the European Commission is due to publish the results of its impact assessment and public consultation on whistleblower protection, and it has now promised to make a proposal in the area of whistleblower protection early next year. The European Parliament should adopt the report on 23rd October, pending further amendments.

https://www.greens-efa.eu/en/article/document/european-parliament-demands-protection-for-whistleblowers-across-europe/

Rubrik: Mein Europa

Bitte teilen!